193(1)No conviction, order or warrant for enforcing the same or other process shall, upon any application by way of judicial review or for habeas corpus or upon any appeal, be held insufficient or invalid,
(a)
for an irregularity, informality or insufficiency therein, or
(b)
by reason of a defect of form or substance therein,
if the court or judge hearing the application or appeal is satisfied by a perusal of the depositions that there is evidence on which the judge might reasonably conclude that an offence under a provision of this Act has been committed.
193(2)In particular, the words “a defect in form or substance” include any excess or defect in the punishment imposed or order made but such inclusion does not affect the generality of those words.